EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 42 / No 3 (September 2010) J Extra Corpor Technol, 42 3 (2010) 191-198 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 42, Number 3, September 2010
Page(s) 191 - 198
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201042191
Published online 15 September 2010
  1. Stammers AH, Mejak BS, Rauch BS, Vang SN, Viessman TW. Factors affecting perfusionists’ decisions on equipment utilization: Results of a United States survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:5–10. [Google Scholar]
  2. Charriere JM, Pelissie J, Verd C, et al. Survey: Retrospective survey of monitoring/safety devices and incidents of cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery in France. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:142–57. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker RA, Wilcox T. Australian and New Zealand Perfusion survey: Equipment and monitoring. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:220–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Groom RC, Froebe S, Martin J, et al. Update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2005 survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:343–50. [Google Scholar]
  5. Swan H, Sanchez M, Tyndall M, Koch C. Quality control of perfusion: Monitoring venous blood oxygen tension to prevent hypoxic acidosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99:868–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alston R, Singh M, McLaren A. Systemic oxygen uptake during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Effects of flow rate, flow character and arterial pH. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98:757–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Society of Clinical Perfusion Scientists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass. Available at: www.scps.org.uk. Accessed May 27, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ottens J, Baker RA, Newland RF, Mazzone A. The future of the per-fusion record: Automated data collection vs. manual recording. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:355–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Newland RF, Baker RA, Stanley R. Electronic data processing: The pathway to automated quality control of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:139–43. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker RA, Newland RF. Continuous quality improvement of perfusion practice: The role of electronic data collection and statistical control charts. Perfusion. 2008;23:7–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stammers AH. Monitoring controversies during cardiopulmonary bypass: How far have we come? Perfusion. 1998;13:35–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. American Society of Extracorporeal Technology. Guidelines for Perfusion Practice. Essential 5. Available at www.amsect.org. Accessed May 27, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rubsamen DS. Continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: How soon will it be the standard of care? J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990;4:1–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Merin RG. Con: Continuous blood gas monitoring should not be a standard during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anes. 1992;6:109–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferries LH. Standards of care in perfusion: Should not continuous in-line blood gas monitoring be one? J Extra Corpor Technol. 1992;24:45–8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Southworth R, Sutton R, Mize S, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new in-line continuous blood gas monitor. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:166–70. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Trowbridge C, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective, randomized study. Part 1. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:121–8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hiong YT. Failure of a membrane oxygenation module during cardiopulmonary bypass and its implications for the cardiac anesthesiologist. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995;9:620–1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kurusz M, Andrews JJ, Arens JF. Monitoring oxygen concentration prevents potential adverse patient outcome caused by a scavenging malfunction. Proc Am Acad Card Perf. 1991;12:162–65. [Google Scholar]
  20. McDonald J, Cleland A, Mayer R, Henderson M. The use of in-line oxygen analysers during cardiopulmonary bypass. Proc Am Acad Card Perf. 1992;13:81–85. [Google Scholar]
  21. Trowbridge C, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective, randomized study. Part 2. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:129–37. [Google Scholar]
  22. International Consortium Evidenced Based Practice Registry. International Consortium Evidenced Based Practice. Available at: www.bestpracticeperfusion.org. Accessed May 29, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. Perfusion Downunder. Perfusion Downunder Collaboration Database. Available at: www.perfusiondownunder.com. Accessed May 29, 2009. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.