EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 44 / No 2 (June 2012) J Extra Corpor Technol, 44 2 (2012) 81-89 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 44, Number 2, June 2012
Page(s) 81 - 89
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201244081
Published online 15 June 2012
  1. Malinauskas RASr, Dearing JP, Spinale FG, Crawford FA, von Recum AF. Blood damaging effects in cardiotomy suction return. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1988;20:41–46. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kinard MRII, Shackelford AG, Sistino JJ. Gravity separation of pericardial fat in cardiotomy suction blood: An in vitro model. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:89–91. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sistino J. Back to the stacks? Looking at classic papers related to the current practice of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:265–267. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mack M, Sade R; American Association for Thoracic Surgery Ethics Committee; Society of Thoracic Surgeons Standards and Ethics Committee. Relations between cardiothoracic surgeons and industry. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1334–1336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stump D. Twenty years trying to protect the brain: What do we know? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:302–304. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM, et al. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: A focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:283–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force. Ferraris VA, Brown JR, Despotis GJ, et al. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:944–982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rubens FD, Boodhwani M, Mesana T, Wozny D, Wells G, Nathan HJ. The cardiotomy trial: A randomized, double-blind study to assess the effect of processing of shed blood during cardiopulmonary bypass on transfusion and neurocognitive function. Circulation. 2007;115:I89–I97. [Google Scholar]
  9. Djaiani G, Fedorko L, Borger MA, et al. Continuous-flow cell saver reduces cognitive decline in elderly patients after coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:1888–1895. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Delaney E, Rosinski D, Ellis H, Samolyk KA, Riley JB. An in-vitro comparison between hemobag and non-hemobag ultrafiltration methods of salvaging circuit blood following cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:128–133. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harm SK, Waters JH, Lynn P, et al. Changes in mechanical fragility and free hemoglobin levels after processing salvaged cardiopulmonary bypass circuit blood with a modified ultrafiltration device. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:21–25. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elahi M, Matata B. Commentary. Should the cardiotomy suction blood be cell-saver processed before retransfusion? A clinicopathologic mystery. Acute Card Care. 2008;10:227–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.