Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 44, Number 3, September 2012
Page(s) 139 - 144
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201244139
Published online 15 September 2012
  1. Sellman M, Ivert T, Stensved P, Högberg M. Doppler ultrasound estimation of microbubbles in the arterial line during extracorporeal circulation. Perfusion. 1990;5:23–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Padayachee TS, Parsons S, Theobold R, Gosling RG, Deverall PB. The effect of arterial filtration on reduction of gaseous microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45:647–649. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:34–39. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:395–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arrowsmith JE, Grocott HP, Reves JG, Newman MF. Central nervous system complications of cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:378–393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, et al. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke. 1994;25:1393–1399. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stump D, Rogers A, Hammon J, et al. Cerebral emboli and cognitive outcome after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:113–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barbut D, Yao FS, Hager DN, et al. Comparisons of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and transesophageal echocardiography to monitor emboli during coronary artery bypass surgery. Stroke. 1996;27:87–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Dijk D, Keizer AM, Diephuis JC, et al. Neurocognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:632–639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shroyer AL, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1856–1864. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2008 update. Circulation. 2008;117:e25–e146. [Google Scholar]
  12. Unger F. Open heart surgery in Europe 1993. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10:120–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurusz M, Butler BD. Bubbles and bypass: An update. Perfusion. 2004;19:S49–S55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Demierre D, Maass D, Garcia E, Turina M. ECC sources of gaseous microemboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1985;17:20–26. [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodin MS, Thor EJ, Haworth WS. Use of computational fluid dynamics in the design of the Avecor Affinity oxygenator. Perfusion. 1994;9:217–222. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang JH. Application of CFD in the design of a membrane oxygenator. J Mech Med Biol. 2001;1:11–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Driel MR. Cardioplegia heat exchanger design modelling using computational fluid dynamics. Perfusion. 2000;6:541–548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chan WK, Wong YW. Development of an axial blood pump. In: Ghista DN, Ng EY, eds. Cardiac Perfusion and Pump Engineering. Clinically-Oriented Biomedical Engineering. Vol 1 Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.; 2007:383–418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Riley JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:21–26. [Google Scholar]
  20. Massimino RJ, Gough JD, Stearns GT, Martin JJr. Gaseous emboli removal efficiency in arterial screen filters: A comparative study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1983;15:25–34. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dickinson TA, Riley JB, Crowley JC, Zabetakis PM. In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturer extracorporeal circuit designs. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:206–213. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gourlay T, Gibbons M, Tylor KM. Evaluation of a range of arterial line filters: Part I. Perfusion. 1987;2:297–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gourlay T, Gibbons M, Tylor KM. Evaluation of a range of arterial line filters: Part II. Perfusion. 1988;3:29–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Melchior RW, Rosenthal T, Glatz AC. An in vitro comparison of the ability of three commonly used pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass circuits to filter microemboli. Perfusion. 2010;4:255–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Salavitabar A, Qiu F, Kunselman A, Undar A. Evaluation of the Quadrox-I neonatal oxygenator with an integrated arterial filter. Perfusion. 2010;6:409–415. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Goritz S, Schelkle H, Rein JG, Urbanek S. Dynamic bubble trap can replace an arterial filter during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Perfusion. 2006;21:367–371. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Metlzer TH, Jornitz MW. Filtration in the biopharmaceutical industry, first edition. New York: Informa Healthcare; 1997:307–344. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kurusz M, Conti VR, Speer D, Butler BD. Surface tension changes of perfusate: Implications for gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1985;4:138–142. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hunter PD. Parker Hannifin Corporation; 2011 Available at: http://www.parker.com/literature/Domnick%20Hunter%20Process %20Filtration%20Division/PAFD_literature/Life%20Sciences%20Literature/INTEGRITY%20TESTING.pdf. Accessed August 28, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. Powell FLJr. Structure and function of the respiratory system. In: Johnson LR, ed. Essential Medical Physiology, 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2003:262–264. [Google Scholar]
  31. Herbst DP. Extracorporeal blood filter system. US Patent 7,572,377 B2. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  32. Herbst DP. Extracorporeal blood filter system. US Patent 7,621,407 B2. 2009. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.