EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 45 / No 1 (March 2013) J Extra Corpor Technol, 45 1 (2013) 8-15 References
Free Access
Review
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 45, Number 1, March 2013
Page(s) 8 - 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201345008
Published online 15 March 2013
  1. Noyez L, de Jager MJ, Markou AL. Quality of life after cardiac surgery: Underresearched research. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:511–514. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Koch CG, Khandwala F, Blackstone EH. Health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;12:203–217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boudrez H, De Backer G. Psychological status and the role of coping style after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Results of a prospective study. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:37–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273:59–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosworth HB, Siegler IC, Olsen MK, et al. Social support and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:829–839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Luderitz B, Jung W. Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1749–1757. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thompson DR, Yu CM. Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease—I: Assessment tools. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1993;30:473–483. [Google Scholar]
  9. WHOQOL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res. 1993;2:153–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dempster M, Donnelly M. Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease. Heart. 2000;83:641–644. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Al-Ruzzeh S, Mazrani W, Wray J, et al. The clinical outcome and quality of life following minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg. 2004;19:12–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rumsfeld JS, MaWhinney S, McCarthy MJr, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery. JAMA. 1999;281:1298–1303. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Falcoz PE, Chocron S, Stoica L, et al. Open heart surgery: One-year self-assessment of quality of life and functional outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1598–1604. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fruitman DS, MacDougall CE, Ross DB. Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: Can elderly patients benefit? Quality of life after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2129–2135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tully PJ, Baker RA, Turnbull DA, Winefield HR, Knight JL. Negative emotions and quality of life six months after cardiac surgery: The dominant role of depression not anxiety symptoms. J Behav Med. 2009;32:510–522. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tully PJ, Baker RA, Kneebone AC, Knight JL. Neuropsychologic and quality of life outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective randomized trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22:515–521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Muller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Willich SN. Comparison of the Short Form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart. 2004;90:523–527. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19:787–805. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Visser MC, Fletcher AE, Parr G, Simpson A, Bulpitt CJ. A comparison of three quality of life instruments in subjects with angina pectoris: The Sickness Impact Profile, the Nottingham Health Profile, and the Quality of Well Being Scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:157–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Visser MC, Koudstaal PJ, Erdman RA, et al. Measuring quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke: A feasibility study of four questionnaires in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49:513–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: A new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;35:185–188. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jokinen JJ, Hippeläinen MJ, Hänninen T, Turpeinen AK, Hartikainen JE. Prospective assessment of quality of life of octogenarians after cardiac surgery: Factors predicting long-term outcome. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7:813–818. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chocron S, Etievent JP, Viel JF, et al. Preoperative quality of life as a predictive factor of 3-year survival after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:722–727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chocron S, Tatou E, Schjoth B, et al. Perceived health status in patients over 70 before and after open-heart operations. Age Ageing. 2000;29:329–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dimopoulou I, Anthi A, Michalis A, Tzelepis GE. Functional status and quality of life in long-term survivors of cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1408–1411. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peric V, Borzanovic M, Jovanovic A, Stolic R, Sovtic S, Trajkovic G. The relationship between EuroSCORE preoperative risk prediction and quality of life changes after coronary artery by-pass surgery (Conference Paper). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4:622–626. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peric V, Borzanovic M, Stolic R, et al. Predictors of worsening of patients’ quality of life six months after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg. 2008;23:648–654. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Falcoz PE, Chocron S, Mercier M, Puyraveau M, Etievent JP. Comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the 36-item health survey questionnaires in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1222–1228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651–654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nelson CL, Herndon JE, Mark DB, Pryor DB, Califf RM, Hlatky MA. Relation of clinical and angiographic factors to functional capacity as measured by the Duke Activity Status Index. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:973–975. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hlatky MA, Rogers WJ, Johnstone I, et al. Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:92–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Brooks MM, Chung SC, Helmy T, et al. Health status after treatment for coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial. Circulation. 2010;122:1690–1699. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Valenti L, Lim L, Heller RF, Knapp J. An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after acute myocardial infarction. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:151–161. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hillers TK, Guyatt GH, Oldridge N, et al. Quality of life after myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1287–1296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Dixon T, Lim LL, Oldridge NB. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: Reference data for users. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:173–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ribera A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Alonso J, Cascant P, Soriano N, Brotons C. Is psychometric scoring of the McNew Quality of Life after Myocardial Infarction questionnaire superior to the clinometric scoring? A comparison of the two approaches. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:357–365. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dempster M, Donnelly M, O’Loughlin C. The validity of the MacNew Quality of Life in heart disease questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2004;2:6. [Google Scholar]
  38. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:333–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Huber CH, Goeber V, Berdat P, Carrel T, Eckstein F. Benefits of cardiac surgery in octogenarians—A postoperative quality of life assessment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:1099–1105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Currie ME, Romsa J, Fox SA, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of robotic-assisted coronary artery revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1426–1431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wagner TH, Sethi G, Holman W, et al. Costs and quality of life associated with radial artery and saphenous vein cardiac bypass surgery: Results from a Veterans Affairs multisite trial. Am J Surg. 2011;202:532–535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang Z, Spertus JA, Mahoney EM, et al. The impact of acute coronary syndrome on clinical, economic, and cardiac-specific health status after coronary artery bypass surgery versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year results from the stent or surgery (SoS) trial. Am Heart J. 2005;150:175–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Norris CM, Saunders LD, Ghali WA, et al. Health-related quality of life outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease treated with cardiac surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention or medical management. Can J Cardiol. 2004;20:1259–1266. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rector T, Kubo S, Cohn J. Patients self-assessment of their congestive heart failure: Content, reliability and validity of a new measure: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Fail. 1987;3:198–209. [Google Scholar]
  45. Supino PG, Borer JS, Franciosa JA, et al. Acceptability and psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire among patients undergoing heart valve surgery: Validation and comparison with SF-36. J Card Fail. 2009;15:267–277. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rector TS, Cohn JN. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: Reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Am Heart J. 1992;124:1017–1025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Garin O, Ferrer M, Pont A, et al. Disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires for heart failure: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:71–85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Drenth DJ, Veeger NJ, Middel B, Zijlstra F, Boonstra PW. Comparison of late (four years) functional health status between percutaneous transluminal angioplasty intervention and off-pump left internal mammary artery bypass grafting for isolated high-grade narrowing of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1414–1417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Redlich K, Khaladi N, Peterss S, et al. Conventional aortic valve replacement in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting in the era of interventional approaches. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:455–462. [Google Scholar]
  50. Oldridge N, Höfer S, McGee H, Conroy R, Doyle F, Saner H. The HeartQoL: Part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 7 20 [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  51. Oldridge N, Höfer S, McGee H, Conroy R, Doyle F, Saner H. The HeartQoL: Part I. Development of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 7 20 [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003; 15:261–266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Chang S, Davidson PM, Newton PJ, et al. What is the methodological and reporting quality of health related quality of life in chronic heart failure clinical trials? Int J Cardiol. 2012 2 4 [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  54. CONSORT. CONSORT quality of life extension under development. Available at: www.consort-statement.org/consort-quality-of-life-extension-under-development/. Accessed July 6, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wiebe S, Guyatt G, Weaver B, Matijevic S, Sidwell C. Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:52–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rumsfeld JS, Magid DJ, O’Brien M, et al. Changes in health-related quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:2026–2032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Clifton JC, Finley RJ. Quality-of-life measurement in surgical randomized controlled trials. J Invest Surg. 2001;14:253–258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Höfer S, Benzer W, Alber H, et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life in coronary artery disease patients: A prospective study generating a structural equation model. Psychosomatics. 2005; 46:212–223. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Le Grande MR, Elliott PC, Murphy BM, et al. Health related quality of life trajectories and predictors following coronary artery bypass surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:49. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tully PJ. Psychological depression and cardiac surgery: A comprehensive review. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:224–232. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tully PJ, Baker RA. Depression, anxiety, and cardiac morbidity outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery: A contemporary and practical review. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2012;9:197–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Newland R, Baker RA, Stanley R, Place K, Willcox TW; Perfusion Dowunder Collaboration. The Perfusion Downunder collaborative database project. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:159–165. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–694. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROKE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology. 2007;18:800–804. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.