Free Access
Editorial
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 45, Number 4, December 2013
Page(s) 218 - 219
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201345218
Published online 15 December 2013
  1. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/index.html?redirect=/clia/. Accessed January 4, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellaiche AL, Nielsen PF, Brantlov S, Moller MB, Winterdahl M. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the CDI 500 in-line blood gas monitor with and without gas calibration. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:53–57. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee-Sensiba K, Azzaretto N, Carolina C, et al. Errors in flow and pressure related to the arterial filter purge line. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:77–82. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang S, Miller A, Myers JL, Undair A. ‘Stolen’ blood flow: Effect of an open arterial filter purge line in a simulated neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J. 2008;54:432–435. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Saczkowski R, Maklin M, Mesana T, Boodhwani M, Ruel M. Centrifugal pump and roller pump in adult cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Artif Organs. 2012;36:668–676. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lawson DS, Ing R, Cheifetz IM, et al. Hemolytic characteristics of three commercially available centrifugal blood pumps. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6:573–577. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rawn DJ, Harris HK, Riley JB, Yoda DN, Blackwell MM. An under-occluded roller pump is less hemolytic than a centrifugal pump. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1997;29:15–18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tamari Y, Lee-Sensiba K, Leonard EF, Tortolani AJ. A dynamic method for setting roller pumps nonocclusively reduces hemolysis and predicts retrograde flow. ASAIO J. 1997;43:39–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mongero LB, Beck JR, Orr TW, Kroslowitz RM, Lee-Sensiba K, Oz MC. Clinical evaluation of setting pump occlusion by the dynamic method: Effect on flow. Perfusion. 1998;13:360–368. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Somer F, Mulholland JW, Bryan MR, Aloiso T, Van Nooten GJ, Ranucci M. O2 delivery and CO2 production during cardiopulmonary bypass as determinants of acute kidney injury: Time for a goal-directed perfusion management? Crit Care. 2011;15:R192–R202. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ranucci M, De Toffol B, Isgro G, Romitti F, Conti D, Vicentini M. Hyperlactatemia during cardiopulmonary bypass: Determinants and impact on postoperative outcome. Crit Care. 2006;10:R167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Baker RA, Bronson SL, Dickinson TA, et al. Report from AmSECT’s International Consortium for Evidence-Based Perfusion: American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology standards and guidelines for perfusion practice: 2013. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:156–166. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.