Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 46, Number 2, June 2014
Page(s) 150 - 156
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201446150
Published online 15 June 2014
  1. Charlesworth DC, Likosky DS, Marrin CA, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for strokes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:436–443. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gilman S. Cerebral disorders after open-heart operations. N Engl J Med. 1965;272:489–498. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Selim M. Perioperative stroke. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:706–713. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Likosky DS, Marrin CA, Caplan LR, et al. Determination of etiologic mechanisms of strokes secondary to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Stroke. 2003;34:2830–2834. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blauth CI, Cosgrove DM, Webb BW, et al. Atheroembolism from the ascending aorta. An emerging problem in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103:1104–1111 discussion 11112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Fedorko L, Feindel CM. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: Increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:89–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dickinson TA, Riley JB, Crowley JC, Zabetakis PM. In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturer extracorporeal circuit designs. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:206–213. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu S, Newland RF, Tully PJ, Tuble SC, Baker RA. In vitro evaluation of gaseous microemboli handling of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with and without integrated arterial line filters. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:107–114. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Riley JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:21–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Groom RC, Quinn RD, Lennon P, et al. Detection and elimination of microemboli related to cardiopulmonary bypass. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:191–198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lynch JE, Wells C, Akers T, et al. Monitoring microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass with the EDAC quantifier. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:212–218. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. El-Brawany MA, Nassiri DK. Microemboli detection using ultrasound backscatter. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28:1439–1446. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Palanchon P, Bouakaz A, Klein J, de Jong N. Multifrequency transducer for microemboli classification and sizing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52:2087–2092. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Georgiadis D, Mackay TG, Kelman AW, Grosset DG, Wheatley DJ, Lees KR. Differentiation between gaseous and formed embolic materials in vivo. Application in prosthetic heart valve patients. Stroke. 1994;25:1559–1563. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Phillips D, Chen X, Baggs R, Rubens D, Violante M, Parker KJ. Acoustic backscatter properties of the particle/bubble ultrasound contrast agent. Ultrasonics. 1998;36:883–892. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, Treasure T, Harrison M, Newman S. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke. 1994;25:1393–1399. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD, Vasiliou M, Green RE, Feindel CM. Neuropsychologic impairment after coronary bypass surgery: Effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:743–749. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rodriguez RA, Rubens FD, Wozny D, Nathan HJ. Cerebral emboli detected by transcranial Doppler during cardiopulmonary bypass are not correlated with postoperative cognitive deficits. Stroke. 2010;41:2229–4235. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Groom RC, Quinn RD, Lennon P, et al. Microemboli from cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with a serum marker of brain injury. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:40–44. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Somer FM, Vetrano MR, Van Beeck JP, Van Nooten GJ. Extracorporeal bubbles: A word of caution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:995–1001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Butler BD. Microbubble production by bubble oxygenators. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1985;15:23–24. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jonsson H, Johnsson P, Alling C, Backstrom M, Bergh C, Blomquist S. S100beta after coronary artery surgery: Release pattern, source of contamination, and relation to neuropsychological outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2202–2208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Svenmarker S, Engström KG, Karlsson T, Jansson E, Lindholm R, Aberg T. Influence of pericardial suction blood retransfusion on memory function and release of protein S100B. Perfusion. 2004;19:337–343. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Motallebzadeh R, Kanagasabay R, Bland M, Kaski JC, Jahangiri M. S100 protein and its relation to cerebral microemboli in on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:409–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grocott HP, Croughwell ND, Amory DW, White WD, Kirchner JL, Newman MF. Cerebral emboli and serum S100beta during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1645–1649 discussion 1649–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.