Free Access
| Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 47, Number 1, March 2015
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 29 - 31 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201547029 | |
| Published online | 15 March 2015 | |
- Marco JD, Barner HB. Aortic venting. Comparison of vent effectiveness. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;73:287–292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charrière JM, Pélissié J, Verd C, et al. Survey: Retrospective survey of monitoring/safety devices and incidents of cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery in France. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:142–157. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mejak B, Stammers A, Rauch E, Vang S, Viessman T. A retrospective study on perfusion incidents and safety devices. Perfusion. 2000;15:51–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mills NL, Ochsner JL. Massive air embolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. Causes, prevention, and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980;80:708–717. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stoney W, Alford WCJ, Burrus G, Glassford DJ, Thomas CJ. Air embolism and other accidents using pump oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg. 1980;29:336–340. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines For Perfusion Practice (11/08/2013). [Google Scholar]
- Lewis GS, Czaplicka C. In vitro comparison tests of three LV vent valves. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1990;22:125–130. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.