Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 47, Number 1, March 2015
Page(s) 38 - 43
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201547038
Published online 15 March 2015
  1. Starck CT, Hasenclever P, Falk V, Wilhelm MJ. Interhospital transfer of seriously sick ARDS patients using veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): Concept of an ECMO transport team. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2013;1:46–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1351–1363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryner B, Cooley E, Copenhaver W, et al. Two decades’ experience with interfacility transport on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1363–1370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Staley LL, Dobberpuhl J, Pierce CN, Scott RL, Jaroszewski DE, Arabia FA. Bridge to decision: SWAT team approach used by Mayo Clinic Arizona’s cardiac transport team. Prog Transplant. 2010;20:118–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jaroszewski DE, Kleisli T, Staley L, et al. A traveling team concept to expedite the transfer and management of unstable patients in cardiopulmonary shock. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:618–623. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haneya A, Philipp A, Foltan M, et al. First experience with the new portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system Cardiohelp for severe respiratory failure in adults. Perfusion. 2012;27:150–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Roncon-Albuquerque R, Basilio C, Figueiredo P, et al. Portable miniaturized extracorporeal oxygenation systems for H1N1-related severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: A case series. J Crit Care. 2012;27:454–463. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Philipp A, Arit M, Amann M, et al. First experience with the ultra compact mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system Cardiohelp in interhospital transport. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:978–981. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Paden ML, Conrad SA, Rycus PT, Thiagarajan RR. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Report 2012. ASAIO J. 2013;59:202–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lehle K, Philipp A, Gleich O, et al. Efficiency in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-cellular deposits on polymethylpentene membranes increase resistance to blood flow and reduce gas exchange capacity. ASAIO J. 2008;54:612–617. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gu YJ, Boonstra PW, Graaff R, Rijnsburger AA, Mungroop H, van Oeveren W. Pressure drop, shear stress, and activation of leukocytes during cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparison between hollow fiber and flat sheet membrane oxygenators. Artif Organs. 2000;24:43–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubois J, Jamaer L, Mees U, et al. Ex vivo evaluation of a new neonatal/infant oxygenator: Comparison of the Terumo CAPIOX Baby RX with Dideco Lilliput 1 and Polystan Safe Micro in the piglet model. Perfusion. 2004;19:315–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Alwardt CM, Patel BM, Lowell A, Dobberpuhl J, Riley JB, DeValeria PA. Regional perfusion during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report and educational modules on the concept of dual circulations. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:187–194. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.