Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 47, Number 4, December 2015
Page(s) 242 - 244
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201547242
Published online 15 December 2015
  1. Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice. American Society of Extracorporeal Technology. 2013 Available at: http://www.amsect.org/perfusion-safety/standards-and-guidelines/. Accessed December 6, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker RA, Newland RF, Fenton C, McDonald M, Willcox TW, Merry AF. Developing a benchmarking process in perfusion: A report of the perfusion downunder collaboration. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:26–33. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Groom RC. What does quality mean for perfusionists? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2015;47:73–4. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hankins T. Computer assisted bypass management. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1980;12:95–102. [Google Scholar]
  5. Riley J. A technique for computer-assisted monitoring in the management of total heart-lung bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1981; 13:171–6. [Google Scholar]
  6. Riley J, Hurdle M, Winn B, Wagoner P. Automation of cardiopulmonary bypass data collection. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1985;17:35–9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cham B, Welch W, Janssens Willem E, Van Houwe R, Steemans M. Automatic data collection and feedback processing during cardiopulmonary bypass: A more physiologic approach of a patient under artificial ventilation and circulation. Life Support Syst. 1985;3(Suppl 1):218–22. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hayes R. Computerized data acquisition and data management for the open heart patient. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1987;19:287–9. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hollenberg JP, Pirraglia PA, Williams-Russo P, et al. Computerized data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: A comparison to the hand-written anesthesia record. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:545–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cobb LA. Data collection and retrieval to document the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. New Horiz. 1997;5:164–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Frank D, Williams TE, Hankins T, Chudik J. Evolution of a cardiovascular information system. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:42–5. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ottens J, Baker RA, Newland RF, Mazzone A. The future of the perfusion record: Automated data collection vs. manual recording. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:355–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stammers AH, Trowbridge CC, Pezzuto J, Casale A. Perfusion quality improvement and the reduction of clinical variability. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:48–58. [Google Scholar]
  14. Baker RA, Bronson SL, Dickinson TA, et al. Report from AmSECT’s International Consortium for evidence-based perfusion: American Society of Extracorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice: 2013. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:156–66. [Google Scholar]
  15. Likosky DS. Integrating evidence-based perfusion into practices: The International Consortium for evidence-based perfusion. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:297–301. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Engelman R, Baker RA, Likosky DS, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Bypass-temperature management during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:748–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferraris VA, Brown JR, Despotis GJ, et al. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:944–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Likosky DS, Baker RA, Dickinson TA, et al. Report from AmSECT’s International Consortium for Evidence-Based Perfusion Consensus Statement: Minimal criteria for reporting cardiopulmonary bypass-related contributions to red blood cell transfusions associated with adult cardiac surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2015;47: 83–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hammon JW, Shore-Lesserson L, Dickinson TA. Temperature management guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fung K, Beck JR, Lopez HC2nd, Mongero LB. Case report: Remote monitoring using Spectrum Medical LIve Vue allows improved response time and improved quality of care for patients on cardio-pulmonary support. Perfusion. 2013;28:561–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Svenmarker S, Haggmark S, Jansson E, Lindholm R, Appelblad M, Aberg T. Quality assurance in clinical perfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:409–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Groom R, Likosky DS, Rutberg H. Understanding variation in cardiopulmonary bypass: Statistical Process Control Theory. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004;36:224–30. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Newland RF, Baker RA, Stanley R. Electronic data processing: The pathway to automated quality control of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:139–43. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Baker RA, Newland RF. Continous quality improvement of perfusion practice: The role of electronic data collection and statistical control charts. Perfusion. 2008;23:7–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Riley JB, Kavanaugh TA. Perfusion services national process improvement benchmarking. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:25–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Paugh TA, Dickinson TA, Theurer PF, et al. Validation of a perfusion registry: Methodological approach and initial findings. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:104–15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.