Open Access
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 49, Number 4, December 2017
Page(s) 262 - 272
Published online 15 December 2017
  1. Butler BD, Kurusz M Gaseous microemboli: A review. Perfusion. 1990;5:81–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler BD, Kurusz M Bubbles and bypass: An update. Perfusion. 2004;19(Suppl 1):S49–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lynch JE, Riley JB Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuits. Perfusion. 2008;23:23–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM, et al. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: A focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:283–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muth CM, Shank ES Gas embolism. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:476–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lou S, Ji B, Liu J, et al. Generation, detection and prevention of gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass procedure. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34:1039–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mitchell SJ, Merry AF Perspective on cerebral microemboli in cardiac surgery: Significant problem or much ado about nothing? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2015;47:10–5. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, et al. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke. 1994;25:1393–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Somer F Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: The arterial filter. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;44:P27–30. [Google Scholar]
  10. Matte GS, Connor KR, Liu H, et al. Arterial limb microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: Observations from a congenital cardiac surgery practice. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2016;48:5–10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. De Somer F Impact of oxygenator characteristics on its capability to remove gaseous microemboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:271–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Groom RC, Hessel EA, Murphy GS Optimal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: An evidence-based approach. Int Anesth Res Soc. 2009;108:1394–417. [Google Scholar]
  13. Potger KC, McMillan D, Ambrose M Air transmission comparison of the affinity fusion oxygenator with an integrated arterial filter to the affinity NT oxygenator with a separate arterial filter. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014;46:229–38. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stanzel RDP, Henderson M An in vitro evaluation of gaseous microemboli handling by contemporary venous reservoirs and oxygenator systems using EDAC. Perfusion. 2016;31:38–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jabur GNS, Sidhu K, Willcox TW, et al. Clinical evaluation of emboli removed by integrated versus non-integrated arterial filters in new generation oxygenators. Perfusion. 2015;5:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu S, Newland RF, Tully PJ, et al. In vitro evaluation of gaseous microemboli handling of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with and without integrated arterial line filters. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:107–14. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Medtronic. Affinity Fusion Brochure. 2012 Available at: Accessed January 15, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. AmSECT. Standards and guidelines. 2013 Available at: Accessed January 15, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Blood conservation guidelines. 2011 Available at: Accessed January 15, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Medical Expo. Sorin Inspire 6 Brochure. 2013 Available at: Accessed January 15, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  21. De Somer FM, Vetrano MR, Van Beeck JP, et al. Extracorporeal bubbles: A word of caution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:995–1001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kesmarky G, Kenyeres P, Rabai M, et al. Plasma viscosity: A forgotten variable. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2008;39:243–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Opena Anesthesia. Poiseuille’s law: IV fluids. 2016 Available at: Accessed March 10, 2015. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.