EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 52 / No 1 (March 2020) J Extra Corpor Technol, 52 1 (2020) 22-26 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 52, Number 1, March 2020
Page(s) 22 - 26
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/202052022
Published online 15 March 2020
  1. Stump DA Embolic factors associated with cardiac surgery. Semin CardioThorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;9:151–2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter study of peri-operative Ischemia Research and Education Foundation investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1857–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:395–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Su XW, Undar A Brain protection during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs. 2010;34:91–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Win KN, Wang S, Undar A Microemboli generation, detection and characterization during CPB procedures in neonates, infants, and small children. Am Soc Artif Intern Organs J. 2008;54:486–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herbst DP Effects of purge-flow rate on microbubble capture in radial arterial-line filters. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2016;48:105–12. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rudolph JL, Tilahun D, Treanor PR, et al. Use of a large bore syringe creates significantly fewer high intensity transient signals (HITS) into a cardiopulmonary bypass system than a small bore syringe. Perfusion. 2006;21:67–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johagen D, Appelblad M, Svenmarker S Can the oxygenator screen filter reduce gaseous microemboli? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014;46:60–6. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mathis RK, Lin J, Dogal NM, et al. Evaluation of four pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in terms of perfusion quality and capturing gaseous microemboli. Perfusion. 2012;27:470–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin J, Dogal NM, Mathis RK, et al. Evaluation of Quadrox-i and Capiox FX neonatal oxygenators with integrated arterial filters in eliminating gaseous microemboli and retaining hemodynamic properties during simulated cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2012;1:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Herbst DP The effects of pressure on gases in solution: Possible insights to improve microbubble filtration for extracorporeal circulation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:94–106. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Somer F Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: The arterial filter. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:27–30. [Google Scholar]
  13. Myers GJ, Voorhees C, Haynes R, et al. Post-arterial filter gaseous microemboli activity of five integral cardiotomy reservoirs during venting: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:20–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stanzel RDP, Henderson M An in vitro evaluation of gaseous microemboli handling by contemporary venous reservoirs and oxygenator systems using EDAC. Perfusion. 2016;31:38–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.