EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 55 / No 4 (December 2023) J Extra Corpor Technol, 55 4 (2023) 167-174 References
Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 55, Number 4, December 2023
Page(s) 167 - 174
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2023028
Published online 15 December 2023
  1. Nishinaka T, Kasano Y, Uetsuka T, et al. Effects of use of 6% voluven infusion for priming. J Extra-Corpor Technol. 2015;42(4):418–23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Grundmann R, Heistermann S. Postoperative albumin infusion therapy based on colloid osmotic pressure. A prospectively randomized trial. Arch Surg. 1985;120(8):911–915. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(22):2247–2256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi PT, Yip G, Quinonez LG, Cook DJ. Crystalloids vs. colloids in fluid resuscitation: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:200–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Raiman M, Mitchell CG, Biccard BM, Rodseth RN. Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch colloids with crystalloids for surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:42–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pesonen E, Vlasov H, Suojaranta R, et al. Effect of 4% albumin solution vs ringer acetate on major adverse events in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328:251–258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beukers AM, de Ruijter JAC, Loer SA, Vonk A, Bulte CSE. Effects of crystalloid and colloid priming strategies for cardiopulmonary bypass on colloid oncotic pressure and haemostasis: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35:ivac127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jansen PG, te Velthuis H, Wildevuur WR, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass with modified fluid gelatin and heparin-coated circuits. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:13–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eising GP, Niemeyer M, Günther T, et al. Does a hyperoncotic cardiopulmonary bypass prime affect extravascular lung water and cardiopulmonary function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:282–289. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eising GP, Pfauder M, Niemeyer M, et al. Retrograde autologous priming: is it useful in elective on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:23–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chores JB, Holt DW. Colloid oncotic pressure, monitoring its effects in cardiac surgery. J Extra-Corpor Technol. 2017;49(4):249–256. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Toraman F, Evrenkaya S, Yuce M. Highly positive intraoperative fluid balance during cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcome. Perfusion. 2004;19(2):85–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Martin GS. Fluid balance and colloid osmotic pressure in acute respiratory failure: emerging clinical evidence. Crit Care. 2000;4(Suppl 2):S21–S25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eising GP, Pfauder M, Niemeyer M, et al. Retrograde autologous priming: is it useful in elective on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(1):23–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rioux JP, Lessard M, De Bortoli B, et al. Pentastarch 10% (250 kDa/0.45) is an independent risk factor of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1293–1298. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schortgen F, Girou E, Deye N, Brochard L, CRYCO Study Group. The risk associated with hyperoncotic colloids in patients with shock. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(12):2157–2168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(2):125–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nematbakhsh M, Moradi A. Mathematical model for determination of colloid osmotic pressure: The role of albuminglobulin ratio. J Res Med Sci. 2006;11:364–9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Miki K, Sagawa S, Shiraki K. Factors influencing the determination of colloid osmotic pressure of plasma. J UOEH. 1983;5(4):405–412. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shi X, Tal G, Hankins NP, Gitis V. Fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes: a review. J Water Process Eng. 2014;1:121–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sioutopoulos D, Karabelas A, Mappas V. Membrane fouling due to protein-polysaccharide mixtures in dead-end ultrafiltration; the effect of permeation flux on fouling resistance. Membranes. 2019;9:21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gruskevica K, Mezule L. Cleaning methods for ceramic ultrafiltration membranes affected by organic fouling. Membranes. 2021;11(2):131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.