EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 58 / No 1 (March 2026) J Extra Corpor Technol, 58 1 (2026) 43-50 References
Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 58, Number 1, March 2026
Page(s) 43 - 50
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025051
Published online 13 March 2026
  1. Stammers AH. Monitoring controversies during cardiopulmonary bypass: how far have we come? Perfusion. 1998;13:35–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Southworth R, Sutton R, Mize S, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new in-line continuous blood gas monitor. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:166–170. [Google Scholar]
  3. Trowbridge CC, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective, randomized study – part I. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:120–128. [Google Scholar]
  4. van Hoeven M, Overdevest E, Curvers J, van Heugten H. A comparison of continuous blood gas monitors during cardiopulmonary bypass LivaNova B-Capta, Terumo CDI 500, Spectrum Medical M4. Perfusion. 2023;38:740–746. [Google Scholar]
  5. Swan H, Sanchez M, Tyndall CM, Koch C. Quality control of perfusion: monitoring venous blood oxygen tension to prevent hypoxic acidosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99:868–872. [Google Scholar]
  6. Trowbridge CC, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective, randomized study – part II. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:129–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fried DW, Leo JJ, Mattioni GJ, et al. CDI blood parameter monitoring system 500 – a new tool for the clinical perfusionist. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:25–30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ottens J, Tuble SC, Sanderson AJ, Knight JL, Baker RA. Improving cardiopulmonary bypass: does continuous blood gas monitoring have a role to play? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:191–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stammers AH, Mejak BL, Rauch ED, Vang SN, Viessman TW. Factors affecting perfusionists’ decisions on equipment utilization: results of a United States survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:4–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker RA, Willcox TW. Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: equipment and monitoring. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:220–229. [Google Scholar]
  11. Walcƶak A, Klein T, Voss J, et al. International pediatric perfusion practice: 2016 survey results. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2021;53:7–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rivers PA, Dobalian A, Germinario FA. A review and analysis of the clinical laboratory improvement amendment of 1988: compliance plans and enforcement policy. Health Care Manage R. 2005;30:93–102. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bennett SA, Conn CM, Gill HE, et al. Regulatory requirements for laboratory developed tests in the United States. J Immunol Methods. 2025;537:113813. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bellaiche AL, Nielsen PF, Brantlov S, Møller MB, Winterdahl M. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the CDI 500 in-line blood gas monitor with and without gas calibration. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:53–57. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jonas RA, Bellinger DC, Rappaport LA, Wernovsky G, Hickey PR, Farrell DM, Newburger JW. Relation of pH strategy and developmental outcome after hypothermic circulatory arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:362–368. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hiramatsu T, Miura T, Forbess JM, et al. pH strategies and cerebral energetics before and after circulatory arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:948–58. [Google Scholar]
  17. du Plessis AJ, Jonas RA, Wypij D, et al. Perioperative effects of alpha-stat versus pH-stat strategies for deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in infants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:991–1001. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee MH, Gisnarian CJ, Shann KG. Improved estimation of total blood volume can provide a reliable prediction of dilutional hematocrit and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2019;5:67–72. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee MH, Riley W. Shann KG Can the minimum protamine dose to neutralize heparin at the completion of cardiopulmonary bypass be significantly lower than the conventional practice? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2021;53:170–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee MH, Riley W. Factors associated with errors in the heparin dose response test: recommendations to improve individualized heparin management in cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2021;36:513–523. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Altman DG, Bland JM. Improving doctors’ understanding of statistics. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 1991;154:223–248. [Google Scholar]
  22. Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med. 2015;25:141–151. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–160. [Google Scholar]
  24. Reagor JA, Gao Z, Tweddell JS. Spectrum medical quantum or Terumo CDI 500: which device measures hemoglobin and oxygen saturation most accurately when compared to a benchtop blood analyzer? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2021;53:181–185. [Google Scholar]
  25. Steinfelder-Visscher J, Teerenstra S, Gunnewiek JM, Weerwind PW. Evaluation of the i-STAT point-of-care analyzer in critically ill adult patients. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:57–60. [Google Scholar]
  26. Indrasari ND, Wonohutomo JP, Sukartini N. Comparison of point‐of‐care and central laboratory analyzers for blood gas and lactate measurements. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019;33:e22885. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kantekin ÇU, Ercan M, Oğuz EF, et al. Evaluation of the i-STAT Blood Gas Analysis System in Cardiovascular Surgery. Med LabTechnol. 2018;4:35–42. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jawa A, Motara F, Moolla M, Laher AE. A comparative assessment of the nova stat profile prime plus® critical care analyzer. Cureus. 2020;21:12. [Google Scholar]
  29. Marklin GF, Bresler R, Dhar R. Point-of-care blood gas analyzers have an impact on the acceptance of donor lungs for transplantation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020;80:623–629. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.