| Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 46, Number 3, September 2014
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 229 - 238 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201446229 | |
| Published online | 15 September 2014 | |
Original Articles
Air Transmission Comparison of the Affinity Fusion Oxygenator with an Integrated Arterial Filter to the Affinity NT Oxygenator with a Separate Arterial Filter
Perfusion and Autotransfusion Unit, Department of Anaesthesia & Pain Management, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Address correspondence to: Kieron C. Potger, CCP, BSc, Dip Perf, MClinN, Perfusionist, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific Highway, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
13
March
2014
Accepted:
6
August
2014
Abstract
Arterial filters used in the extracorporeal circuit (ECC) have been shown to minimize cerebral injury by capturing particulate matter and microbubbles. We clinically use the Affinity NT oxygenator with an Affinity arterial filter attached (“Affinity system”). The new Affinity Fusion oxygenator (“Fusion”) incorporates integrated arterial filtering. Our aim was to determine if the Fusion oxygenator was as safe as the Affinity system in terms of relative microbubble transmission of introduced air. A recirculating in vitro circuit primed with blood was used to compare the Fusion with the Affinity system. Microbubbles were detected using a GAMPT BC100 Doppler in the oxygenator–arterial filter outflow line. Measurements were taken 1 minute before and 3 minutes after bolusing 30 mL air proximal to the venous reservoir while altering pump flow rates (3 L/min; 5 L/min). Both the Fusion and Affinity system transmitted microbubbles during air injection. Microbubble volume transmitted at 5 L/min pump flow was significantly greater than at 3 L/min in both systems. The Fusion tended to transmit fewer bubbles, less bubble volume, and smaller sized bubbles than the Affinity system. Under the parameters of this in vitro study, the Affinity Fusion oxygenator with an integrated arterial filter is as safe as the Affinity NT oxygenator with a separate arterial filter in terms of microbubble transmission. However, more research is needed to confirm this study’s findings and generalizability to the clinical environment. As both oxygenator–arterial filter systems transmitted microbubbles during air introduction, it is important to develop strategies to minimize microbubble entry into the ECC.
Key words: extracorporeal circuit / oxygenator / arterial filter / microbubbles
The senior author has stated that the authors have reported no material, financial, or other relationship with any healthcare-related business or other entity whose products or services are discussed in this paper.
© 2014 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
