Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 37, Number 3, September 2005
Page(s) 256 - 264
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200537256
Published online 15 September 2005
  1. Kurusz M, Butler BD Bubbles and bypass: an update. Perfusion. 2004;19(Suppl 1):49–55. [Google Scholar]
  2. Challa VR, Moody DM, Troost BT Brain embolic phenomena associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Neurol Sci. 1993;117:224–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, et al. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:89–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stump DA, Roger AT, Hammon JW, Newmann SP Cerebral emboli and cognitive outcome after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:113–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ Vacuum-assisted venous drainage: To air or not to air, that is the question. Has the bubble burst? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:24–8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD, et al. Neuropsychologic impairment after coronarybypass surgery: Effect of gaseousmicroemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:743–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mitchel S, Gorman D The pathophysiology of cerebral arterial gas embolism. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:18–21. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arnold JV, Blauth CI, Smith PLC, Jago JR, Wooton R, Taylor KM Demonstrating of cerebral microemboli occurring during coronary artery bypass graft surgery using fluorescein angiography. J Audiovisual Media Med. 1990;13:87–90 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clayton RH, Pearson DT, Murray A Clinical comparison of two devices for detection of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Clin Phys Mess. 1990;11:327–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jenderka KV, Dietrich G, Cobet U, Kopsch B, Klemenz A, Urbanek PDetection of Micro Bubbles in the Extracorporeal Circulation. IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium 1998 IEEE (ISBN0-7803-4095-7/98) [Google Scholar]
  11. Urbanek S, Tiedtke HJ Improved methods for measurement of gaseous microbubbles during extracorporeal circulation. Perfusion. 2002;17:429–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Beckley PD, Shinko PD, Sites JP A comparison of gaseous emboli in five membrane oxygenators. Perfusion. 1997;12:133–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA How Effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:34–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Normann MJ, Sistino JJ, Acsell JR The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004;36:336–42. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.