Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 38, Number 2, June 2006
Page(s) 134 - 138
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200638134
Published online 15 June 2006
  1. Puskas JD, Winston AD, Wright CE, et al. Stroke after coronary artery operation: incidence, correlates, outcome, and cost. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1053–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tunio AM, Hingorani A, Ascher E. The impact of an occluded internal carotid artery on the mortality and morbidity of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Surg. 2000;178:201–5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Makino M, Nagakane Y, Kawagoe C, et al. Risk management based on the preoperative evaluations for asymptomatic brain infarction and atherosclerotic vascular lesions in patients with cardiovascular surgery (in Japanese). Jpn J Stroke. 2000;22:570–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Makino M. Risk factor for cervical carotid and intracranial cerebrovascular legions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting; preoperative evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging and angiography. J Kyoto Prefect Univ Med. 2001;110:1111–21. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J. Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 1999;30:1538–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Weimar C, Kurth T, Kraywinkel K, et al. Assessment of functioning and disability after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2002;33:2053–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Roberts L, Counsell C. Assessment of clinical outcomes in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 1998;29:986–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wallenstein S, Zucker CL, Fleiss JL. Some statistical methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res. 1980;47:1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, et al. Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1198–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kshettry VR, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. Does multivessel, off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce postoperative morbidity? Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1725–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia in collaboration with the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation. 2005;111:2858–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yaku H, Shimada Y, Takahashi A, et al. Off pump versus on pump CABG: does off pump CABG reduce operative morbidity?. J Jpn Coron Assoc. 2002;7:185–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ishida M, Kobayashi J, Tagusari O, et al. Perioperative advantages of off pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Jpn Circ J. 2002;66:795–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bergman P, van der Linden J. Atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta as a major determinant of the outcome of cardiac surgery. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005;2:246–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lytle BW. Prolonging patency—choosing coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2262–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.