Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 38, Number 2, June 2006
Page(s) 139 - 143
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200638139
Published online 15 June 2006
  1. Ottens J, Baker RA, Newland RF, Mazzone A. The future of the perfusion record: automated data collection vs manual recording. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:355–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Riley JB. Are perfusion technology and perfusionists ready for quality reporting employing six-sigma performance measurement? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003;35:168–71. [Google Scholar]
  3. Groom R, Likosky DS, Rutberg H. Understanding variation in cardiopulmonary bypass: statistical process control theory. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004;36:224–30. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. ISO 9000. Definitions Translated into Plain English. Alberta, Canada: Praxiom Research Group. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rath and Strong Management Consultants. Six Sigma Pocket Guide. AON Consulting Worldwide, Lexington, MA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickinson T, Riley J, Zabetkis PM. External validation of compliance to perfusion quality indicators. Perfusion. 2004;19:295–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hollenburg JP, Pirraglia PA, Williams-Russo P, et al. Computerised data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison to the hand–written record. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:545–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.