EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 38 / No 3 (September 2006) J Extra Corpor Technol, 38 3 (2006) 214-215 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 38, Number 3, September 2006
Page(s) 214 - 215
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200638214
Published online 15 September 2006
  1. Jones T, Deal D, Vernon J, et al. Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass? Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:2132–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitchell S, Willcox T, Gorman D. Bubble generation and venous air filtration by hard-shell venous reservoirs: a comparative study. Perfusion. 1997;12:325–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Willcox T, Mitchell S, Gorman D. Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1285–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Willcox T. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage: to air or not to air, that is the question. Has the bubble burst? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:24–8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McLaggan L, Willcox T, Mills B, et al. Arterial line emboli in two current generation cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: effects of venous air and pulsatile flow [Abstract]. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:305. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rider SP, Simon LV, Rice BJ, Poulton CC. Assisted venous drainage, venous air, and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: an in-vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:160–5. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lapietra A, Grossi EA, Pua BB, et al. Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:856–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, et al. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:34–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rudolph JL, Tilahun D, Treanor PR, et al. Use of a large bore syringe creates significantly fewer high intensity transient signals (HITS) into a cardiopulmonary bypass system than a small bore syringe. Perfusion. 2006;21:67–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler BD, Karusz M. Embolic events. In: Gravlee G, Davis R, Karusz M, Utley JR, eds. Cariopulmonary Bypass–Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  11. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ. The influence of vacuum assisted drainage on arterial line emboli. 2002;34:228–9; author reply 229-30. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitchell S, Willcox T, Gorman D. Bubble generation by the Medtronic Maxima hard-shell adult venous reservoir in cardiopulmonary bypass circuits [Abstract]. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society 1996;23 (Supp 13). [Google Scholar]
  13. Eckmann DM, Armstead SC, Mardini F. Surfactants reduce platelet-bubble and platelet-platelet binding induced by in vitro air embolism. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:1204–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, et al. Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass? Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:2132–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guidance for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Oxygenators 510(k) Submissions; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. 2000 http://fda .gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/1361.html. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.