EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 3 (September 2011) J Extra Corpor Technol, 43 3 (2011) 107-114 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 43, Number 3, September 2011
Page(s) 107 - 114
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201143107
Published online 15 September 2011
  1. Barak M, Katz Y. Microbubbles: Pathophysiology and clinical implications. Chest. 2005;128:2918–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Stump DA. Embolic factors associated with cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;9:151–2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, Treasure T, Harrison M, Newman S. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke. 1994;25:1393–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD, Vasiliou M, Green RE, Feindel CM. Neuropsychologic impairment after coronary artery bypass surgery. Effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:743–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rodriguez RA, Williams KA, Babaev A, Rubens F, Nathan HJ. Effect of perfusionist technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2005;20:3–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mitchell SJ, Willcox T, McDougal C, Gorman DF. Emboli generation by the Medtronic Maxima hard-shell adult venous reservoir in cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: A preliminary report. Perfusion. 1996;11:145–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mitchell SJ, Willcox T, Gorman DF. Bubble generation and venous air filtration by hard-shell venous reservoirs: A comparative study. Perfusion. 1997;12:325–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous micro-emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:34–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Weitkemper HH, Oppermann B, Spilker A, Knobl HJ, Körfer R. Gaseous microemboli and the influence of microporous membrane oxygenators. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:256–64. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dickinson TA, Riley JB, Crowley JC, Zabetakis PM. In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturers extra-corporeal circuit designs. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:206–13. [Google Scholar]
  11. Riley JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:21–6. [Google Scholar]
  12. De Somer FMJJ, Vetrano MR, Van Beeck JPAJ, Van Nooten GJ. Extracorporeal bubbles: A word of caution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:995–1001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lynch JE, Riley JB. Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuits. Perfusion. 2008;23:23–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Emboli Detection and Classification (EDAC®) Quantifier Users Guide. Blacksburg, VA: Luna Innovations; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rudolph JL, Tilahun D, Treanor PR, et al. Use of a large bore syringe creates significantly fewer high intensity transient signals (HITS) into a cardiopulmonary bypass system than a small bore syringe. Perfusion. 2006;21:67–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Myers GJ, Voorhees C, Haynes R, Eke B. Post-arterial filter gaseous microemboli activity of five integral cardiotomy reservoirs during venting: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:20–7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Preston TJ, Gomez D, Olshove VF, Phillips A, Galantowicz M. Clinical gaseous microemboli assessment of an oxygenator with integral arterial filter in the pediatric population. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:226–30. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ. Microemboli in our bypass circuits: A contemporary audit. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:31–7. [Google Scholar]
  20. De Somer FMJJ. Impact of oxygenator characteristics on its capability to remove gaseous microemboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:271–3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Groom RC, Quinn RD, Lennon P, et al. Detection and elimination of microemboli related to cardiopulmonary bypass. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:191–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Barak M, Nakhoul F, Katz Y. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of microbubbles during hemodialysis. Semin Dial. 2008;21:232–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.