EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 45 / No 2 (June 2013) J Extra Corpor Technol, 45 2 (2013) 77-85 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 45, Number 2, June 2013
Page(s) 77 - 85
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201345077
Published online 15 June 2013
  1. Lee R, Li S, Rankin S, et al. Fifteen-year outcome trends for valve surgery in North America. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:677–684. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hickey GL, Grant SW, Murphy GJ, et al. Dynamic trends in cardiac surgery: Why the logistic EuroSCORE is no longer suitable for contemporary cardiac surgery and implications for future risk models. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 11 14 [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  3. McKhann GM, Grega MA, Borowicz LM, Baumgartner WA, Selnes OA. Stroke and encephalopathy after cardiac surgery an update. Stroke. 2006;37:562–571. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fearn SJ, Pole R, Wesnes K, Faragher EB, Hooper TL, McCollum CN. Cerebral injury during cardiopulmonary bypass: Emboli impair memory. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:1150–1160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Likosky DS, Roth RM, Saykin AJ, Eskey CJ, Ross CS, O’Connor GT. Neurological injury associated with CABG surgery: Outcomes, mechanisms, and opportunities for improvement. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7:650–661. [Google Scholar]
  6. Motallebzadeh R, Bland JM, Markus HS, Kaski JC, Jahangiri M. Neurocognitive function and cerebral emboli: Randomized study of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:475–482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, Treasure T, Harrison M, Newman S. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke. 1994;25:1393–1399. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Groom C, Quinn RD, Lennon P, et al. Microemboli from cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with a serum marker of brain injury. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:40–44. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Groom RC, Quinn RD, Lennon P, et al. Detection and elimination of microemboli related to cardiopulmonary bypass. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:191–198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Abu-Omar Y, Balacumaraswami L, Pigott DW, Matthews PM, Taggart DP. Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolisation during off-pump, on-pump, and open cardiac surgery procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1759–1765. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gallagher G, Pearson DT. Ultrasonic identification of sources of gaseous microemboli during open heart surgery. Thorax. 1973;28:295–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Myers GJ. Preventing gaseous microemboli during blood sampling and drug administration: An in vitro investigation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:192–198. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Svitek V, Lonsky V, Anjum F. Pathophysiological aspects of cardiotomy suction usage. Perfusion. 2010;25:147–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Baker RA, Wilcox TW. Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: Equipment and monitoring. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006; 38:220–229. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Myers GJ, Voorhees C, Haynes R, Eke B. Post-arterial filter gaseous microemboli activity of five integral cardiotomy reservoirs during venting: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:20–27. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gesellschaft fur Angewandte Medizinische Physik und Technik mbH. Bubble Counter BC100: A device for the detection of micro bubbles in streaming fluids (user manual). Merseburg: GAMPT mbH; 4 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Potger KC, McMillan D, Ambrose M. Microbubble generation and transmission of Medtronic’s affinity hardshell venous reservoir and collapsible venous reservoir bag: An in-vitro comparison. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:115–122. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Barak M, Yeshayahu K. Microbubbles: Pathophysiology and clinical implications. Chest. 2005;128:2918–2932. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dexter F, Hindman BJ, Marshall JS. Estimate of the maximum absorption rate of microscopic arterial air emboli after entry into the arterial circulation during cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 1996;11:445–450. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Somer F. Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: The arterial filter. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:27–30. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mitchell SJ, Willcox T. Bubble generation and venous air filtration by hard-shell venous reservoirs: A comparative study. Perfusion. 1997;12:325–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodriquez RA, Williams KA, Babaev A, Rubens F, Nathan HJ. Effect of the perfusionists technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2005;20:3–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nielsen PF, Funder JA, Jenson MO, Nygaard H. Influence of venous reservoir level on microbubbles in cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2008;23:347–353. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pearson DT, Watson BG, Waterhouse PS. An ultrasonic analysis of the comparative efficiency of various cardiotomy reservoirs and micropore blood filters. Thorax. 1978;33:352–358. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Webb WR, Harrison LH, Helmcke FR, et al. Carbon dioxide field flooding minimizes residual intracardiac air after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1489–1491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ündar A, Palanzo D, Wang S. Using a secondary reservoir for pump suckers to avoid the generation of foam during CPB procedures in pediatric patients. Perfusion. 2012;27:556–558. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. De Somer FM, Vetrano MR, Van Beeck JP, Van Nooten GJ. Extracorporeal bubbles: A word of caution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:995–1001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.