EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 46 / No 3 (September 2014) J Extra Corpor Technol, 46 3 (2014) 239-250 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 46, Number 3, September 2014
Page(s) 239 - 250
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201446239
Published online 15 September 2014
  1. Griffin S, Pugsley W, Treasure T. Microembolism during cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparison of bubble oxygenator with arterial line filter and membrane oxygenator alone. Perfusion. 1991;6:99–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Herbst DP. The effects of pressure on gases in solution: Possible insights to improve microbubble filtration for extracorporeal circulation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:94–106. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Riley JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:21–26. [Google Scholar]
  4. Myers GJ, Voorhees C, Haynes R, Eke B. Post-arterial filter gaseous microemboli activity of five integral cardiotomy reservoirs during venting: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:20–27. [Google Scholar]
  5. Preston TJ, Gomez D, Olshove VF, Phillips A, Galantowicz M. Clinical gaseous microemboli assessment of an oxygenator with integral arterial filter in the pediatric population. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:226–230. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu S, Newland RF, Tully PJ, Tuble SC, Baker RA. In vitro evaluation of gaseous microemboli handling of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with and without integrated arterial line filters. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:107–114. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:34–39. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Norman MJ, Sistino JJ, Acsell JR. The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004;36:336–342. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ. Microemboli in our bypass circuits: A contemporary audit. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:31–37. [Google Scholar]
  10. Burnside J, Gomez D, Preston TJ, Olshove VF, Phillips A. In-vitro quantification of gaseous microemboli in two extracorporeal life support circuits. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:123–129. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weitkemper HH, Oppermann B, Spilker A, Knobl HJ, Körfer R. Gaseous microemboli and the influence of microporous membrane oxygenators. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:256–264. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dickinson TA, Riley JB, Crowley JC, Zabetakis PM. In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturer extracorporeal circuit designs. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:206–213. [Google Scholar]
  13. Herbst DP, Najm HK. Development of a new arterial-line filter design using computational fluid dynamics analysis. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:139–144. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kurusz M, Conti VR, Speer D, Butler BD. Surface tension changes of perfusates: Implications for gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1985;17:138–142. [Google Scholar]
  15. Palanzo DA, Kurusz M, Butler D. Surface tension effects of heparin coating on arterial line filters. Perfusion. 1990;5:277–284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mueller XM, Tevaearai HT, Jegger D, Augstburger M, Burki M, von Segesser LK. Ex vivo testing of the Quart® arterial line filter. Perfusion. 1999;14:481–487. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yarham G, Mulholland J. Pre-clinical laboratory evaluation of the new ‘AF’ arterial line filter range. Perfusion. 2010;25:267–276. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. De Somer FM, Vetrano MR, Van Beeck JP, Van Nooten GJ. Extracorporeal bubbles: A word of caution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:995–1001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.