EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 47 / No 3 (September 2015) J Extra Corpor Technol, 47 3 (2015) 174-179 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 47, Number 3, September 2015
Page(s) 174 - 179
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201547174
Published online 15 September 2015
  1. Kurusz M, Butler BD. Bubbles and bypass: An update. Perfusion. 2004;19:S49. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitchell S, Gorman D. The pathophysiology of cerebral arterial gas embolism. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:18–23. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Fedorko L, Feindel CM. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: Increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:89–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ, Gorman DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: A source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1285–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu S, Newland RF, Tully PJ, Tuble SC, Baker RA. In vitro evaluation of gaseous microemboli handling of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with and without integrated arterial line filters. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:107–14. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin KK, Wigginton JB, Babikian VL, Pochayd VE, Crittenden MD, Rudolph JL. Intraoperative cerebral high-intensity transient signals and postoperative cognitive function: A systematic review. Am J Surg. 2009;197:55–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doganci S, Gunaydin S, Murat Kocak O, Yilmaz S, Demirkilic U. Impact of the intensity of microemboli on neurocognitive outcome following cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2013;28:256–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SIII System Operators Manual, (version GA-5311-0003.00E, 5th update: 11/1997) Munich, Germany: Stockert Instrumente; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  9. De Somer FM, Vetrano MR, Van Beeck JP, Van Nooten GJ. Extracorporeal bubbles: A word of caution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:995–1001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelting T, Searles B, Darling E. A survey on air bubble detector placement in the CPB circuit: A 2011 cross-sectional analysis of the practice of certified clinical perfusionists. Perfusion. 2011;27:345–51. [Google Scholar]
  11. Baker RA, Willcox TW. Australian and New Zealand Perfusion Survey: Equipment and monitoring. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:220–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Charrière JM, Pélissié J, Verd C, et al. Survey: Retrospective survey of monitoring/safety devices and incidents of cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery in France. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007; 39:142–57. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mejak B, Stammers A, Rauch E, Vang S, Viessman T. A retrospective study on perfusion incidents and safety devices. Perfusion. 2000;15:51–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Groenenberg I, Weerwind PW, Everts PAM, Maessen JG. Dutch perfusion incident survey. Perfusion. 2010;25:329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. S5 System Operating Instructions, (version GA-5811-0000.03.5 ENG, Version 02/2011) Munich, Germany: Sorin Group; 2011. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.