Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 58, Number 2, June 2026
Page(s) 102 - 109
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025070
Published online 19 June 2026
  1. Bienstock J, Heuer A. A review on the evolution of simulation-based training to help build a safer future. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(25):e29503. [Google Scholar]
  2. Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Okatta AU, Amaechi EC, Elendu TC, Ezeh CP, et al. The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(27):e38813. [Google Scholar]
  3. Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions. The importance of simulation in health professions education. 2024. Available at: https://www.mghihp.edu/news-and-more/opinions/health-professions-education-effects/importance-simulation-health-professions-education. Accessed March 11, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  4. Higham H. Simulation past, present and future-a decade of progress in simulation-based education in the UK. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021;7(5):404–409. [Google Scholar]
  5. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28. [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis SP, Stover CF, Willhaus JK. Simulation use in entry-into-practice respiratory care programs. Respir Care. 2022;67(6):676–681. [Google Scholar]
  7. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706–711. [Google Scholar]
  8. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):50–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feins RH, Burkhart HM, Conte JV, Coore DN, Fann JI, Hicks GL, Jr., et al. Simulation-based training in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):312–321. [Google Scholar]
  10. Villanueva C, Xiong J, Rajput S. Simulation-based surgical education in cardiothoracic training. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(6):978–983. [Google Scholar]
  11. Morris RW, Pybus DA. “Orpheus” cardiopulmonary bypass simulation system. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39(4):228–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sistino JJ, Michaud NM, Sievert AN, Shackelford AG. Incorporating high fidelity simulation into perfusion education. Perfusion. 2011;26(5):390–394. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Searles BE, Riley JB, Darling EM, Wiles JR. Simulated cardiopulmonary bypass: a high fidelity model for developing and accessing clinical perfusion skills. Adv Simul (Lond). 2024;9(1):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs. Standards and guidelines for the accreditation of educational programs in perfusion. 2019. Available at: https://www.caahep.org/program-directors/standards-and-guidelines. Accessed March 11, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vanderbilt University. REDCap Upstate Medical University. Available at: https://redcap.upstate.edu. Accessed March 14, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  16. Graesser AC, Cai Z, Louwerse M, Daniel F. Question Understanding Aid (QUAID): A web facility that helps survey methodologists improve the comprehensibility of questions. Public Opin. Q. 2006;70:3–22. [Google Scholar]
  17. Perfusion Program Directors’ Council. Programs. 2025. Available at: https://perfusionschool.org/programs/. Accessed October 4, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  18. Darling EM, Searles B. The Role of Simulation in Perfusion: A 2010 survey of the perfusion community. SUNY Connect; 2010. Presentation. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1951/71452. Accessed September 23, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ripic A, Leonor A. Simulation use in the education of perfusion students: A review. AACP Newsl. 2020;3:1–3. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):783–788. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.