Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 43, Number 3, September 2011
Page(s) 123 - 129
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201143123
Published online 15 September 2011
  1. Undar A, Ji B, Kunselman AR, Myers JL. Detection and classification of gaseous microemboli during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in a simulated neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J. 2007;53:725–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Win KN, Wang S, Undar A. Microemboli generation, detection and characterization during CPB procedures in neonates, infants, and small children. ASAIO J. 2008;54:486–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schreiner RS, Rider AR, Myers JW, et al. Microemboli detection and classification by innovative ultrasound technology during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass at different flow rates, perfusion modes, and perfusate temperatures. ASAIO J. 2008;54:316–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler B. Gaseous micro emboli: Concepts and considerations. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1983;15:148–55. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lynch JE, Riley JB. Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuits. Perfusion. 2008;23:23–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Groom RC, Froebe S, Martin J, et al. Update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2005 Survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:343–50. [Google Scholar]
  7. Myers G. Preventing gaseous microemboli during blood sampling and drug administration:An in vitro investigation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:192–8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Preston TJ, Gomez D, Olshove VF, Phillips A, Galantowicz M. Clinical gaseous microemboli assessment of an oxygenator with integral arterial filter in the pediatric population. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:226–30. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barak M, Katz Y. Microbubbles: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Chest. 2005;128:2918–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, et al. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1162–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Merkle F, Bottcher W, Hetzer R. Prebypass filtration of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: An outdated technique? Perfusion. 2003;18:81–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Merkle F, Boettcher W, Schulz F, et al. Reduction of microemboli count in the priming fluid of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003;35:133–8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurusz M, Conti VR, Speer D, Butler BD. Surface tension changes of perfusates: Implications for gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1985;17:138–42. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang S, Win KN, Kunselman AR, Woitas K, Myers JL, Undar A. The capability of trapping gaseous microemboli of two pediatric arterial filters with pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow in a simulated infant CPB model. ASAIO J. 2008;54:519–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous micro-emboli? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:34–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Riley JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:21–6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gomez D, Preston TJ, Olshove VF, Phillips AB, Galantowicz ME. Evaluation of air handling in a new generation neonatal oxygenator with integral arterial filter. Perfusion. 2009;24:107–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. De Somer F. Impact of oxygenator characteristics on its capability to remove gaseous microemboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39: 271–3. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lawson SD, Lawson AF, Walczak R, et al. North American neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) devices and team roles: 2008 survey results of extracorporeal life support organization (ELSO) centers. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:166–74. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.