Technique Article

Optimizing Venous Drainage Using an Ultrasonic Flow Probe on the Venous Line

^* Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
^† Department of Perfusion Services, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina

Address correspondence to: Joshua L. Walker, BS, CCP, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive MC# 7841, San Antonio, TX 78229. E-mail: Joshua.walker@gmail.com

Received: 15 April 2010
Accepted: 21 January 2011

Abstract

The use of smaller cannulae for minimally invasive surgery techniques and/or aggressive miniaturization of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuitry has necessitated the need to augment venous drainage to achieve adequate flow rates. Vacuum assisted venous drainage (VAVD) has become the dominant method to augment venous drainage. VAVD, however, has been associated with a number of known side effects including increased transmission of gaseous microemboli to the patient, venous line chatter, and increased arterial to venous shunts in the circuit. Historically, our practice has been to monitor the arterial output flow rate and to monitor VAVD by observing venous line chatter and changes in the venous reservoir level. In 2008 our pediatric cardiothoracic service began monitoring venous line flow rates by using a second ultrasonic flow probe placed on the venous line. After 12 months, our staff perfusionists reviewed the impact of monitoring venous line flow rates on VAVD and its known side effects on daily clinical practice. When monitoring venous line flow rates, empiric observation revealed that less overall vacuum pressure was needed for our CPB cases. This novel approach to monitoring venous drainage has aided us in providing optimal vacuum levels and therefore, may reduce some of the known side effects experienced with excessive VAVD.