EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 45 / No 2 (June 2013) J Extra Corpor Technol, 45 2 (2013) 122-127 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 45, Number 2, June 2013
Page(s) 122 - 127
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201345122
Published online 15 June 2013
  1. Jones RE, Donald DE, Swan HJ, Harshbarger HG, Kirklin JW, Wood EH. Apparatus of the Gibbon type for mechanical bypass of the heart and lungs; preliminary report. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1955;30:105–113. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jegger D, Tevaearai HT, Horisberger J, et al. Augmented venous return for minimally invasive open heart surgery with selective caval cannulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:312–316. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Banbury MK, White JA, Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM3rd. Vacuum-assisted venous return reduces blood usage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:680–687. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Durandy Y. The impact of vacuum-assisted venous drainage and miniaturized bypass circuits on blood transfusion in pediatric cardiac surgery. ASAIO J. 2009;55:117–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Somer F. Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: The arterial filter. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:27–30. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ojito JW, Hannan RL, Miyaji K, et al. Assisted venous drainage cardiopulmonary bypass in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:1267–1271; discussion 1271–2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Karamlou T, Schultz JM, Silliman C, et al. Using a miniaturized circuit and an asanguineous prime to reduce neutrophil-mediated organ dysfunction following infant cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:6–13; discussion 13–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yoshizumi K, Ishino K, Ugaki S, et al. Effect of a miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass system on the inflammatory response and cardiac function in neonatal piglets. Artif Organs. 2009;33:941–946. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nakanishi K, Shichijo T, Shinkawa Y, et al. Usefulness of vacuum-assisted cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for pediatric open-heart surgery in reducing homologous blood transfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:233–238. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayashi Y, Kagisaki K, Yamaguchi T, et al. Clinical application of vacuum-assisted cardiopulmonary bypass with a pressure relief valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:621–626. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lau CL, Posther KE, Stephenson GR, et al. Mini-circuit cardiopulmonary bypass with vacuum assisted venous drainage: Feasibility of an asanguineous prime in the neonate. Perfusion. 1999;14:389–396. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Senay S, Toraman F, Gunaydin S, Kilercik M, Karabulut H, Alhan C. The impact of allogenic red cell transfusion and coated bypass circuit on the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8:93–99. [Google Scholar]
  13. Matte GS, Kussman BD, Wagner JW, et al. Massive air embolism in a Fontan patient. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:79–83. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jahangiri M, Rayner A, Keogh B, Lincoln C. Cerebrovascular accident after vacuum-assisted venous drainage in a Fontan patient: A cautionary tale. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1727–1728. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iannoli ED. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for differential diagnosis of poor venous return during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:43–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lapietra A, Grossi EA, Pua BB, et al. Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:856–862. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA. Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass? Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:2132–2137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang S, Undar A. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage and gaseous microemboli in cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:249–256. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rider SP, Simon LV, Rice BJ, Poulton CC. Assisted venous drainage, venous air, and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: An in-vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:160–165. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Willcox TW. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage: To air or not to air, that is the question. Has the bubble burst? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:24–28. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ. The influence of vacuum assisted drainage on arterial line emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:151–152. [Google Scholar]
  22. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ, Gorman DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: A source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuumassisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1285–1289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rodriguez RA, Rubens F, Belway D, Nathan HJ. Residual air in the venous cannula increases cerebral embolization at the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:175–1780. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. De Somer F, Dierickx P, Dujardin D, Verdonck P, Van Nooten G. Can an oxygenator design potentially contribute to air embolism in cardiopulmonary bypass? A novel method for the determination of the air removal capabilities of neonatal membrane oxygenators. Perfusion. 1998;13:157–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Beckley PD, Shinko PD, Sites JP. A comparison of gaseous emboli release in five membrane oxygenators. Perfusion. 1997;12:133–141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2002;34:34–39. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mehra AP, Akins A, Maisuria A, Glenville BE. Air handling characteristics of five membrane oxygenators. Perfusion. 1994;9:357–362. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Fedorko L, Feindel CM. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: Increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:89–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mueller XM, Tevaearai HT, Horisberger J, Augstburger M, Burki M, von Segesser LK. Vacuum assisted venous drainage does not increase trauma to blood cells. ASAIO J. 2001;47:651–654. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mathews RK, Sistino JJ. In-vitro evaluation of the hemolytic effects of augmented venous drainage. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2001;33:15–18. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fiorucci A, Gerometta PS, DeVecchi M, Guzman C, Costantino ML, Arena V. In vitro assessment of the vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD) system: Risks and benefits. Perfusion. 2004;19:113–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Walker JL, Young HA, Lawson DS, Husain SA, Calhoon JH. Optimizing venous drainage using an ultrasonic flow probe on the venous line. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:157–161. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.